CHUE v. LEHMAN

No. 4D09-128.

21 So.3d 890 (2009)

Edna Ramos CHUE, Appellant, v. Richard S. LEHMAN, individually and Richard S. Lehman, P.A., a professional association, Hilda Piza Lucom, individually, Melinda Morrice, individually, Frank Morice, individually, Gilberto Arias, Jr., individually, Julian Cabarcos, individually, Hector E. Infante, individually, Infante & Perez Almillano, a civil law firm partnership, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

November 4, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Matias R. Dorta of Tew Cardenas, LLP, Miami, for appellant.

Steven M. Katzman and Charles J. Bennardini of Katzman, Wasserman, Bennardini & Rubinstein, P.A., Boca Raton for appellees, Richard S. Lehman and Richard S. Lehman, P.A.


DAMOORGIAN, J.

Edna Ramos Chue appeals the trial court's denial of her Motion to Recover Attorney's Fees and Tax Costs and Motions for Sanctions under section 57.105(1), Florida Statutes (2008). The standard for reviewing the denial of a motion for attorney's fees under section 57.105(1) is clear abuse of discretion. Nasser v. Nasser, 975 So.2d 531, 532 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

This appeal arises out of a complaint filed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases