1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 215 P.3d
  5. 215 P.3d 476 (2009)
 

CHAPMAN v. CHAPMAN

No. 34614.

215 P.3d 476 (2009)

Kay CHAPMAN, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Vondel and Becky CHAPMAN, husband and wife, Defendants-Respondents.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, May 2009 Term.

August 21, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anderson Nelson Hall Smith, Idaho Falls, for appellant. Marvin M. Smith argued.

Thomsen Stephens Law Offices, Idaho Falls, for respondents. Alan Stephens argued.

HORTON, Justice.

This appeal arises from a jury verdict in a premises liability case in favor of Respondents Vondel and Becky Chapman. Kay Chapman (Kay) appeals, asserting that the district court erred by excluding testimony from her expert witness and refusing to give some of Kay's requested jury instructions. Kay also asserts that the jury's verdict is not supported by the evidence presented at trial. We affirm.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases