1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 220 P.3d
  5. 220 P.3d 242 (2009)
 

ESPINAL v. STATE

No. A-10606.

220 P.3d 242 (2009)

Airjetis ESPINAL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Alaska, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Alaska.

November 17, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Krista Maciolek, Assistant Public Advocate, Palmer, and Rachel Levitt, Public Advocate, Anchorage, for the Petitioner.

Brittany L. Dunlop, Assistant District Attorney, and Adrienne Bachman, District Attorney, Anchorage, and Daniel S. Sullivan, Attorney General, Juneau, for the Respondent.

Before: COATS, Chief Judge, and MANNHEIMER and BOLGER, Judges.

OPINION

MANNHEIMER, Judge.

Airjetis Espinal petitions this Court to review an evidentiary ruling of the superior court. For the reasons explained here, we deny the petition; that is, we decline to review the superior court's ruling at this time.

Espinal was originally charged with sexually assaulting, or attempting to sexually assault, four people during the course of a single evening: J.L., M.T., K.T., and P.M. In addition, Espinal was charged...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases