ROGAL v. UTA PETERS RANDALL

SC 18444.

981 A.2d 1078 (2009)

293 Conn. 934

Hilb ROGAL and Hobbs Company et al. v. UTA PETERS RANDALL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided October 13, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Scott S. Centrella, Stamford, in support of the petition.

Sheila A. Huddleston, Glenn M. Cunningham and Lee A. Duval, Hartford, in opposition.


The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 115 Conn.App. 89, 971 A.2d 796 (2009), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Whether the Appellate Court properly determined that the trial court should have supplied missing words in a nonsolicitation provision in an employment agreement without resorting to the equitable remedy of reformation because the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases