RUYLE v. SAFECO INS. CO. OF AMERICA

Case No. CV 09-0069-CWD.

640 F.Supp.2d 1262 (2009)

Constance RUYLE, Plaintiff, v. SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, and Does I-V, unknown Parties, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Idaho.

June 29, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Scott L. Lundgreen, Johnson and Lundgreen, Boise, ID, for Plaintiff.

Mark D. Sebastian, Robert A. Anderson, Anderson Julian and Hull LLP, Boise, ID, for Defendants.


MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

CANDY W. DALE, United States Chief Magistrate Judge.

The Court has before it Plaintiffs Motion to Remand. (Docket No. 5.) Having reviewed the parties' briefing, as well as the record in this action, the Court has determined that oral argument on the motion is not necessary. Dist. Idaho Loc. Civ. R. 7.1(d)(2). The Court finds, as more fully explained below, that Plaintiffs Motion to Remand will be denied.

I.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases