1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 607 F.Supp.2d
  5. 607 F.Supp.2d 1119 (2009)
 

FLORENCE v. STANBACK

No. CV 07-8184 RSWL (FMO).

607 F.Supp.2d 1119 (2009)

David FLORENCE, Plaintiff, v. E.R. STANBACK, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, C.D. California.

March 23, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Florence, Represa, CA, pro se.

Mina K. Choi, CAAG Office of Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants.

ORDER Re: MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

RONALD S.W. LEW, Senior, District Judge.

The Court has reviewed and considered defendants' Motion for Reconsideration and concludes that oral argument is not necessary to resolve this motion. See Fed. R.Civ.P. 78; Local Rule 7-15; Willis v. Pac. Mar. Ass'n, 244 F.3d 675, 684 n. 2 (9th Cir.2001, as amended Mar. 27, 2001).

On June 9, 2008, defendants filed a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases