INTAMIN, LTD. v. MAGNETAR TECHNOLOGIES CORP.

Case No. CV 04-0511 GAF (JWJx).

623 F.Supp.2d 1055 (2009)

INTAMIN, LTD., Plaintiff, v. MAGNETAR TECHNOLOGIES CORP et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, C.D. California.

May 22, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John B. Sganga, David G. Jankowski and Christopher L. Ross of Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP, Irvine, CA, for Defendant Magnetar Technologies Corp. et al.

Ted S. Ward of Berke, Kent & Ward LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff Intamin, Ltd.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

GARY ALLEN FEESS, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

In 2004, Plaintiff Intamin, Ltd. filed this lawsuit alleging a braking system manufactured by Defendant Magnetar Technologies Corp. infringes Intamin's U.S. Patent Number 6,062,350 ("the '350 patent"), titled "Braking System for an Amusement Device," which describes a magnetic braking system used on amusement park rides. Magnetar...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases