O'DANIEL v. STROUD NA

CIV. No. 05-5089-KES.

607 F.Supp.2d 1065 (2009)

Perle O'DANIEL, Plaintiff, v. STROUD NA and Judy Roosa, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. South Dakota, Western Division.

March 16, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James P. Hurley, Bangs, McCullen, Butler, Foye & Simmons, Rapid City, SD, Patrick M. Ginsbach, Farrell, Farrell & Ginsbach, Hot Springs, SD, for Plaintiff.

Carl S. Wosmek, Henry M. Helgen, III, McGrann, Shea, Anderson, Carnival, Straughn & Lamb, Minneapolis, MN, G. Verne Goodsell, Goodsell Quinn, LLP, Patricia A. Meyers, Costello Porter Hill Heisterkamp Bushnell & Carpenter, Rapid City, SD, for Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

KAREN E. SCHREIER, Chief Judge.

Defendants, Stroud NA (Stroud) and Judy Roosa, move for a protective order forbidding plaintiff from making inquiry into matters related to punitive damages. Plaintiff, Perle O'Daniel, opposes the motion. The motion is granted.

DISCUSSION

I. Motion Proper

The law of the case doctrine provides that a court's decision on legal issues should govern...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases