STATE v. BIG CROW

No. 24949.

773 N.W.2d 810 (2009)

2009 SD 87

STATE of South Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. James BIG CROW, Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

Decided September 23, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marty J. Jackley, Attorney General, John M. Strohman, Assistant Attorney General, Pierre, South Dakota, Attorneys for plaintiff and appellee.

Elizabeth Lorina of Gonzalez Law Firm, Rapid City, South Dakota, Attorneys for defendant and appellant.


ZINTER, Justice.

[¶ 1.] James Big Crow was charged with two counts of incestuous sexual contact involving his niece. After a hearing, the circuit court allowed admission of acts of incestuous sexual contact involving two other nieces. The court admitted the other acts evidence to prove a common plan, design or scheme under SDCL 19-12-5 (Rule 404(b)). The jury convicted and Big Crow appeals.

Facts and Procedural History

[¶ 2.] Big...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases