UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Iouri MIKHEL, Defendant-Appellant.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Filed January 5, 2009.
Filed January 5, 2009.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Robert Edward Dugdale, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Michael Tanaka, Esq., Sean J. Bolser, Esq., Office of the Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before: ALFRED T. GOODWIN, STEPHEN REINHARDT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Before us is defendant-appellant Iouri Mikhel's Motion to Allow Attorney-Client Access Without "SAM" Restrictions. We have jurisdiction ancillary to our jurisdiction over Mikhel's direct appeal and pursuant to our authority to "regulate practice in a particular case [before us] in any manner consistent with federal law." Fed. R.App. P. 47(b); see Daccarett-Ghia v. Comm'r,70 F.3d 621, 623...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
