ENDERS/MADEN v. SUPER FRESH

Civil Action No. 05-669-JJF.

594 F.Supp.2d 507 (2009)

Judy ENDERS/MADEN, Plaintiff, v. SUPER FRESH, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

January 27, 2009.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Judy Enders/Maden, Wilmington, DE, Pro Se Plaintiff.

John P. Barry, Esquire of Proskauer Rose LLP, Newark, NJ, William W. Bowser, Esquire and Margaret M. DiBianca, Esquire of Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE. for Defendant, Super Fresh.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

FARNAN, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is Defendant's Motion For Summary Judgment. (D.I. 43.) For the reasons discussed, the Court will grant Defendant's Motion.

I. BACKGROUND

A. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On September 14, 2005, Plaintiff Judy Enders/Maden, who is proceeding pro se, filed this action against Defendant Super Fresh pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases