1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 72 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 72 Cal.Rptr.3d 926 (2008)
 

ADAIMY v. RUHL

No. B193745.

72 Cal.Rptr.3d 926 (2008)

160 Cal.App.4th 583

Edmond ADAIMY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Sandra RUHL et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One.

February 28, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Ernest J. Franceschi and Ernest J. Franceschi, Los Angeles; Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, Robert F. Helfing, Los Angeles, and Kirk C. Jenkins for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Barnes, Crosby, FitzGerald & Zeman, Michael J. FitzGerald and Eric P. Francisconi, Irvine, for Defendants and Respondents.

JACKSON, J.*

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Edmond Adaimy appeals from a judgment in favor of defendants Sandra Ruhl and Jerash, LLC and from an order denying his motion for new trial. Plaintiff contends the trial court erred in denying a new trial based on inconsistent special verdicts and a vague special verdict form. He further contends the trial court abused its discretion in declining to resolve equitable issues. Defendants claim...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases