1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 547 F.Supp.2d
  5. 547 F.Supp.2d 436 (2008)
 

SYNTHES (USA) v. SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.

Civil Action No. 03-cv-0084.

547 F.Supp.2d 436 (2008)

SYNTHES (USA), Plaintiff, v. SMITH & NEPHEW, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

February 4, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brian M. Poissant, Jones Day, New York, NY, Brian M. Rothery, Charles E. Cantine, Kevin C. Ecker, Robert Hardman, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, New York, NY, Robert W. Hayes, Robert R. Reeder, Edward C. Tompsett, Cozen O'Connor, Philadelphia, PA, Brent P. Ray, Jones Day, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff.

Gregory N. Stillman, Hunton & Williams LLP, Brent L. Vannorman, Norfolk, VA, Rodger L. Tate, Hunton & Williams LLP, Bradley T. Lennie, Washington, DC, Thomas E. Zemaitis, Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz, Elizabeth S. Campbell, Pepper Hamilton LLP, Philadelphia, PA, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOYNER, District Judge.

At issue is the construction of disputed terms and phrases used in U.S. Patent No. 5,053,036 ("the '036 patent"), U.S. Patent No. 6,623,486 ("the '486 patent"), and U.S. Patent No. 7,128,744 ("the '744 patent"). The parties seek construction of eleven terms or phrases from the '036 patent, five terms or phrases from the '486 patent, and five terms or phrases from the '744 patent. Currently before the court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases