1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 76 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 76 Cal.Rptr.3d 21 (2008)
 

SOTO v. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

No. E042725.

76 Cal.Rptr.3d 21 (2008)

162 Cal.App.4th 492

Jose SOTO, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District, Division Two.

April 2, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kinkle, Rodiger & Spriggs, Bruce E. Disenhouse, Riverside; Arias & Lockwood and Christopher D. Lockwood, San Bernadino, for Defendant and Appellant.

Lackie & Dammeier, Dieter C. Dammeier and Michael A. McGill, Upland, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

RAMIREZ, P.J.

Defendant County of Riverside (County) challenges the trial court's judgment after an order granting plaintiff Jose Soto's (Soto) motion for summary judgment on a writ of mandate. The judgment: (1) declares unconstitutional the provision in a memorandum of understanding requiring a disciplined employee to pay for half of the hearing costs for an administrative appeal if the employee pursues the appeal through privately retained counsel...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases