Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the appellant's contention, the presentment agency met its initial burden of demonstrating that the identification procedure was reasonable and not unduly suggestive by presenting testimony that the identification was spontaneous and occurred in close spatial and temporal proximity to the offense (see Matter of Kassan D.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.