ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Richard Heckenlively appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. Heckenlively raises two constitutional claims, both of which could have been brought in his direct appeal and, as a result, are not cognizable under Rule 29.15. Heckenlively's final point—that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to documents (establishing that Heckenlively had previously pled guilty to several sexual offenses...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
