1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 533 F.Supp.2d
  5. 533 F.Supp.2d 422 (2008)
 

PROSHIPLINE INC. v. ASPEN INFRASTRUCTURES LTD.

No. 07 Civ. 10969.

533 F.Supp.2d 422 (2008)

PROSHIPLINE INC., Plaintiff, v. ASPEN INFRASTRUCTURES LTD., f/k/a/ Suzlon Infrastructure Ltd., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

February 1, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hill, Rivkins and Hayden by John James Sullivan, Esq., Christopher Michael Panagos, Esq., New York City, for Plaintiff

Deorchis & Partners, LLP by John A. Oriel, Esq., New York City, for Defendants.

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Defendant Aspen Infrastructures Ltd. ("Aspen" or the "Defendant") has moved pursuant to Supplemental Admiralty Rule E(4)(f) of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure to vacate the Order and Process of Maritime Attachment and Garnishment issued at the request of plaintiff ProShipLine Inc. ("ProShipLine" or the "Plaintiff').

For the reasons set forth below the motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases