UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP. v. PERKINELMER, INC.

No. 3:05 CV 1824(MRK).

537 F.Supp.2d 392 (2008)

UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. PERKINELMER, INCORPORATED, & Eaton Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

March 24, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Glenn E. Coe, Anne C. Dranginis, Kelley A. Bergelt, Rome McGuigan, P.C., Hartford, CT, Hamilton H. Hill, Paul J. Skiermont, Bartlit, Beck, Herman, Palenchar & Scott, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff.

Glenn A. Duhl, Siegel, O'Connor, O'Donnell & Beck, P.C., Hartford, CT, James F. Kamp, Leigh C. Taggart, Michael B. Stewart, R. Terrance Rader, Steven R. Hansen, Rader, Fishman & Grauer, PLLC, Bloomfield Hills, MI, for Defendants.


Memorandum of Decision on Claim Construction

MARK R. KRAVITZ, District Judge.

In this case, Plaintiff, United Technologies Corporation ("UTC"), asserts that Defendants, PerkinElmer, Incorporated ("PerkinElmer") and Eaton Corporation ("Eaton"),1 infringed UTC's United States Patent 5,597,167 (the "'167 Patent"), entitled "Brush Seal with Fool Proofing, and Anti-Rotation Tab...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases