Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly denied the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. In support of their motion, the defendants submitted evidence that the plaintiff Tomas Cabrera (hereinafter the injured plaintiff) had significant restrictions in motion of the lumbar and cervical regions of his spine (see Bentivegna v Stein,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.