1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 579 F.Supp.2d
  5. 579 F.Supp.2d 322 (2008)
 

WRIGHTEN v. CITY OF NEW LONDON POLICE DEPT.

Civil No. 3:07cv257 (JBA).

579 F.Supp.2d 322 (2008)

James F. WRIGHTEN, Plaintiff, v. The CITY OF NEW LONDON POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

September 29, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James F. Wrighten, New London, CT, pro se.

Brian K. Estep, Patrick J. Day, Conway & Londregan, PC, New London, CT, for Defendant.

RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

JANET BOND ARTERTON, District Judge.

In this case brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, pro se Plaintiff James Wrighten, an African-American man, alleges that police officers violated his Fourth Amendment rights by seizing him in his car without justification. Wrighten has not named the officers involved as defendants, but instead has sued the police department of the City of New London ("City"),

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases