ROCHE PALO ALTO LLC v. RANBAXY LABORATORIES LTD.

Civil Action No. 06-cv-2003 (FLW).

551 F.Supp.2d 349 (2008)

ROCHE PALO ALTO LLC, Plaintiff, v. RANBAXY LABORATORIES LIMITED et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

March 19, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David E. Delorenzi, Sheila F. Mcshane, Gibbons, PC, Newark, NJ, for Plaintiff.

Brooks R. Bruneau, Kristine L. Butler, Robert G. Shepherd, Mathews, Shepherd, Mccay, & Bruneau, PA, Princeton, NJ, Diane C. Ragosa, Thomas J. Meloro, Jr., Willkie, Farr & Gallagher, LLP, New York, NY, for Defendants.


OPINION

WOLFSON, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is the Motion of Defendants, Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited and Ranbaxy Inc., (collectively referred to as "Ranbaxy"), for Summary Judgment of Invalidity for Improper Inventorship on Plaintiff Roche Palo Alto LLC ("Roche")'s United States Patent, No. 6,083,953 (the "953 Patent"). Ranbaxy argues that the '953 Patent is invalid because the patent originally issued with improper inventorship and was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases