Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Although the Supreme Court stated that the appellant's motion for leave to reargue was denied, the court, in fact, considered the merits of the underlying motion and cross motion and adhered to its original determination. Thus, contrary to the contention of the plaintiffs and the defendants-respondents, the order dated January 5, 2007 is appealable (see Noble v Noble,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.