The defendant contends that the court erred in discharging, sua sponte, certain prospective jurors based on their responses to questions regarding whether they or a relative had been arrested or convicted of a crime. The court properly excused those prospective jurors based on its own questioning which revealed, by their own admissions, that they could not be fair and impartial (
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. ANDERSON
48 A.D.3d 825 (2008)
851 N.Y.S.2d 370
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. TYRONE ANDERSON, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided February 26, 2008.
Decided February 26, 2008.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.