STATE v. ALPHONSE

No. 58449-9-I.

174 P.3d 684 (2008)

STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Edison ALPHONSE, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

January 7, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Susan F. Wilk, Washington Appellate Project, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Appellant/Cross-Respondent.

Thomas Marshal Curtis, Snohomish County Pros. Ofc., Everett, WA, for Respondent/Cross-Appellant.


AGID, J.

¶ 1 Edison Alphonse appeals his convictions for felony and misdemeanor telephone harassment. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, asserting that RCW 9.61.230 must be construed to require proof that he had the intent to harass, intimidate, torment, or embarrass when he initiated the call. He also contends that the terms "to embarrass," "lewd," "lascivious," "indecent," and "obscene" render the statute unconstitutionally overbroad on its face...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases