Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiff's motion for leave to renew because he failed to present "new facts not offered on the prior motion that would change the prior determination" (CPLR 2221 [e] [2]; see Williams v Nassau County Med. Ctr.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.