GOLDMAN v. SIMPSON

No. B200082.

72 Cal.Rptr.3d 729 (2008)

160 Cal.App.4th 255

Fredric GOLDMAN, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Orenthal James SIMPSON, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Four.

February 20, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard L. Enkelis, Pasadena, and Ronald P. Slates, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Appellant.

Sommer Barnard, Jonathan G. Polak; Haven Law, Peter T. Haven; Cook Collection Attorneys and David J. Cook, San Francisco, for Plaintiff and Respondent.


WILLHITE, J.

INTRODUCTION

Defendant Orenthal James Simpson appeals from an order denying his motion to vacate the renewal of a money judgment in favor of plaintiff Frederic Goldman. Simpson contends that the renewal of the judgment was void because he had insufficient contacts with California to confer personal jurisdiction when the renewal was entered. We conclude that the trial court properly denied Simpson...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases