DIOMED, INC., Plaintiff,
v.
TOTAL VEIN SOLUTIONS, Defendant.
United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 9, 2008.
June 9, 2008.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Michael A. Albert, James J. Foster Wolf, Michael N. Rader, Charles T. Steenburg, John L. Strand, Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C., Boston, MA, for Plaintiff.
Craig V. DePew Clark, Depew & Tracey, Ltd., L.L.P., Keith Jaasma, Erik A. Knockaert, Barden Todd Patterson, Henry M. Pogorzelski, Patterson & Sheridan, LLP, Houston, TX, Anne C. Pareti, Burns & Levinson LLP, Boston, MA, Doak C. Procter, IV, Fulbright & Jaworski, LLP, Houston, TX, for Defendant.
Diane A.D. Noel, Merton E. Thompson, Burns & Levinson LLP, Boston, MA, for Counter Claimant, Total Vein Solutions, LLC.
United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
GORTON, District Judge.
This action arises out of a patent infringement dispute. Plaintiff Diomed, Inc. ("Diomed") alleges that defendant Total Vein Solutions, LLC ("TVS") has infringed Diomed's rights under U.S. Patent No. 6,398,777 ("the '777 patent"). Because TVS has now filed a petition for protection under the bankruptcy laws, Diomed seeks to amend the complaint to add the individual...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
