HEINZE v. BAUER

No. 33579.

178 P.3d 597 (2008)

Timothy S. HEINZE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles B. BAUER, Defendant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, December 2007 Term.

Rehearing Denied March 14, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ellis, Brown, & Sheils, Boise, for appellant. Allen Ellis argued.

Moffatt, Thomas, Barrett, Rock & Fields, Boise, for respondent. Mark Prusynski argued.


HORTON, Justice.

This is a legal malpractice action. Appellant Timothy Heinze appeals from the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Respondent Charles Bauer dismissing Heinze's complaint. This Court is asked to decide whether Heinze is judicially estopped from pursuing a claim that Bauer negligently recommended Heinze accept the terms of a divorce settlement after Heinze stipulated to the settlement, under oath, in court. We affirm.

I. FACTUAL...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases