AHR v. KAROLEWSKI


48 A.D.3d 719 (2008)

853 N.Y.S.2d 172

THOMAS AHR, Appellant, v. JOSEPH KAROLEWSKI et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided February 26, 2008.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

"[T]he discretionary power to set aside a jury verdict and order a new trial must be exercised with considerable caution, for in the absence of indications that substantial justice has not been done, a successful litigant is entitled to the benefits of a favorable jury verdict" (Nicastro v Park, 113 A.D.2d 129, 133 [1985]). Moreover, "[a] jury verdict should not be set aside...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases