ROESSNER v. EMPLOYEE TERM LIFE

Civil No. 3:07cv1434 (JBA).

589 F.Supp.2d 174 (2008)

Barbara ROESSNER, Plaintiff, v. EMPLOYEE TERM LIFE, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

December 11, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew Houlding, John F. Strother, Rome McGuigan, Hartford, CT, for Plaintiff.

David C. Salazar-Austin, Victoria Woodin Chavey, Day Pitney LLP, Hartford, CT, for Defendants.


RULING ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND

JANET BOND ARTERTON, District Judge.

Plaintiff Barbara Roessner moves for leave to amend her complaint in this action to add a new theory of recovery under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(3). Defendants object, arguing that Plaintiff has not shown good cause for allowing such leave and that to permit a new claim at this stage...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases