1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 72 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 72 Cal.Rptr.3d 690 (2008)
 

VALLEY ADVOCATES v. CITY OF FRESNO

No. F050952.

72 Cal.Rptr.3d 690 (2008)

160 Cal.App.4th 1039

VALLEY ADVOCATES et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF FRESNO et al., Defendants and Respondents; Perez, Williams & Medina, Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

Court of Appeal of California, Fifth District.

February 15, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Richard L. Harriman and Richard L. Harriman, Fresno, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

James C. Sanchez, City Attorney, and Kathryn C. Phelan, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendants and Respondents.

Perez, Williams & Medina and Robert Gray Williams, Fresno, for Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

Certified for Partial Publication.*

OPINION

DAWSON, J.

This appeal concerns an application to demolish a building located in downtown Fresno and expand a parking lot onto the cleared land. The building is one of two nearly identical 90-year-old apartment buildings located next to one another. After receiving the site plans, the City of Fresno (City) (1) decided not to list...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases