1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 539 F.3d
  5. 539 F.3d 218 (2008)
 

ROSENAU v. UNIFUND CORP.

No. 07-3019.

539 F.3d 218 (2008)

Richard ROSENAU, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. UNIFUND CORP. a/k/a Unifund Group Corp.; Unifund CCR Partners. Richard Rosenau, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Filed: August 20, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cary L. Flitter (Argued), Lundy, Flitter, Beldecos & Berger, Narberth, PA, for Appellant.

Richard J. Perr (Argued), Fineman, Krekstein & Harris, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellees.

Before: RENDELL, SMITH and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

FISHER, Circuit Judge.

Richard Rosenau claims that a debt-collection letter he received from Unifund Corporation and/or Unifund CCR Partners ("Unifund") was deceptive under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ("FDCPA"), 15 U.S.C. § 1692e. The District Court granted Unifund's motion for judgment on the pleadings. Rosenau appeals, arguing that the letter was deceptive because (1) it implied that it came from an attorney and (2...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases