Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant correctly contends that count four of the indictment, which alleged that he violated Environmental Conservation Law § 33-1301 (8-a) and § 71-2907 (3) by knowingly engaging in the business of applying pesticides for hire at a residence without having registered with the Commissioner of the Department of Environmental Conservation, only alleged a violation, since it did not allege that he applied a "restricted...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.