PER CURIAM.
In this mental commitment case, appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the trial court's finding that, because of a mental disorder, appellant is a danger to others. ORS 426.005(1)(d)(A). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient. On de novo review, we agree that the evidence is insufficient to support involuntary commitment.
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.