1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 176 P.3d
  5. 176 P.3d 560 (2008)
 

ENDICOTT v. SAUL

Nos. 58435-9-I, 58531-2-I.

176 P.3d 560 (2008)

Ronald ENDICOTT and Donald Endicott, Respondents, v. Robert and Samantha SAUL, husband and wife, and Linda and Vernon Gabelein, husband and wife, Appellants. and Emma Endicott, Appellant, v. Ronald Endicott and Donald Endicott, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

February 4, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John W. Demco, L'Nayim Shuman-Austin, Demco Law Firm PS, Matthew F. Davis, Attorney at Law, Seattle; WA, H. Clarke Harvey, Attorney at Law, Clinton, WA, for Appellants.

Carolyn Cliff, Attorney at Law, Langley, WA, for Respondents.

Michael Mert Waller, Zylstra Beeksma & Waller PLLC, Oak. Harbor, WA, for Guardian. Ad Litem.

H. Clarke Harvey, Attorney at Law, Clinton, WA, for Other Parties.

SCHINDLER, A.C.J.

¶ 1 Emma Endicott (Emma), Samantha and Robert Saul (the Sauls), and Linda and Vernon Gabelein (the Gabeleins) challenge the trial court's decision to establish a limited guardianship for Emma under the Guardianship Act, chapter 11.88 RCW, and to issue a protective order under the Abuse of Vulnerable. Adults Act (AVA), chapter 74.34 RCW. After a ten-day bench trial that took place over the course of three months, the trial court concluded clear...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases