Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
There is no merit to the defendant's contention that the hearing court improperly denied that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony on the ground that it was tainted by a suggestive photographic identification procedure. The hearing court's conclusion that the witness's prior familiarity with the defendant was such that he was impervious to police suggestion was supported by the evidence...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
