Defendant's challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction of first-degree criminal contempt under Penal Law § 215.51 (b) (iii) is without merit. In violation of orders of protection, defendant continued to leave threatening messages for officials of the college where he had been a student. Each victim testified to his subjective fear, and such fear was objectively reasonable, given the explicit death threats contained in the messages (compare...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
