Ordered that the order is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court properly denied his motion for resentencing under the Drug Law Reform Act of 2005 (L 2005, ch 643). Since the defendant was, at the time of his motion, less than three years from being eligible for release on parole (see L 2005, ch 643, § 1; Correction Law § 851 [2]), he did not qualify for resentencing (see People v McCurdy,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
