PIZZO v. GOOR


50 A.D.3d 586 (2008)

857 N.Y.S.2d 526

JANET PIZZO, Appellant, v. JOEL GOOR, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided April 29, 2008.


Defendant's promise to pay plaintiff money at the end of their cohabitation relationship is unenforceable because the main consideration therefor, under the parties' cohabitation agreement, was plaintiff's provision of "companionship (both platonic and sexual)" (see Morone v Morone, 50 N.Y.2d 481, 486 [1980]; McRay v Citrin, 270 A.D.2d 191 [2000]). Furthermore, the agreement, which was executed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases