SHATRIYA v. GILDEN


50 A.D.3d 586 (2008)

855 N.Y.S.2d 366

WOLFGANG SHATRIYA, Respondent, v. BRUCE GILDEN et al., Defendants, and MAGNUM PHOTOS INTERNATIONAL, INC., Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided April 29, 2008.


The motion court correctly held that an issue of fact as to the meaning of the term "PR" or "public relations" precludes summary judgment on the cause of action for breach of a contract allegedly prohibiting the posting of plaintiff model's photographs on the Internet. Injunctive relief may be available should plaintiff prevail on his cause of action for breach of contract and show that damages are an inadequate remedy. We have considered and rejected appellant's other...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases