In this action for breach of a loan agreement representing $29.7 million worth of Brazilian airline financing, even if plaintiff lenders' attorneys did represent both sides in the loan transactions at issue, defendants knew at all times that they represented plaintiffs, did not have a reasonable expectation of confidentiality in their dealings with them, and thus cannot seek their disqualification in litigation over the loan obligations (Meyers v Lipman,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
VOLO LOGISTICS LLC v. VARIG LOGISTICA S.A.
51 A.D.3d 554 (2008)
859 N.Y.S.2d 127
VOLO LOGISTICS LLC et al., Appellants, v. VARIG LOGISTICA S.A., Respondent, et al., Defendant. VOLO LOGISTICS LLC, Plaintiff, and CAT AEREA LLC, Respondent, v. VARIG LOGISTICA S.A., Appellant, et al., Defendant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided May 22, 2008.
Decided May 22, 2008.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
