1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 246 S.W.3d
  5. 246 S.W.3d 356 (2008)
 

IN RE BATH JUNKIE FRANCHISE, INC.

Nos. 09-07-395 CV, 09-07-437 CV.

246 S.W.3d 356 (2008)

In re BATH JUNKIE FRANCHISE, INC. and Bath Junkie Franchise, Inc., Appellant, v. Hygiene, L.L.C., Cheryl Pinson, Individually, and Debra Redden, Individually, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Beaumont.

Decided February 7, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven E. Couch, Charles W. Kelly, Kelly, Sutter & Kendrick, P.C., Houston, for relator and appellant.

Kip Patterson, Andrea C. Peel, Baker & Patterson, L.L.P., Houston, for real parties in interest and appellees.

Before McKEITHEN, C.J., KREGER and HORTON, JJ.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

By way of petition for writ of mandamus and interlocutory appeal, Bath Junkie Franchise, Inc. ("Bath Junkie") seeks relief from the trial court's denial of its motion to compel arbitration. In a single issue, Bath Junkie contends that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion. We have consolidated the two proceedings and dispose of them simultaneously. We agree that the trial court erred when it denied Bath Junkie's...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases