Defendant raises various issues relating to the voluntariness of his plea and the effectiveness of his representation by counsel. However, defendant expressly states that he does not wish his plea to be vacated, and instead requests that this Court remand for resentencing, or make an unspecified discretionary reduction in his sentence. Neither of these remedies is appropriate for any of defendant's claims (see People v Johnson,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. EDWARDS
51 A.D.3d 540 (2008)
857 N.Y.S.2d 567
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KENT EDWARDS, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided May 22, 2008.
Decided May 22, 2008.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.