STATE BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL v. DUNCAN

Nos. A115491, A115663.

76 Cal.Rptr.3d 507 (2008)

162 Cal.App.4th 289

STATE BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. John C. DUNCAN as Director, etc., et al., Defendants and Appellants; Southern California Housing Development Corporation, Real Party In Interest and Appellant. State Building and Construction Trades Council of California, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. John C. Duncan as Director, etc., et al., Defendants and Appellants; Southern California Housing Development Corporation, Real Party In Interest and Respondent.

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Two.

As Modified on Denial of Rehearing May 16, 2008.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Department of Industrial Relations, Office of Director—Legal Unit, Vanessa L. Holton, Chief Counsel, Douglas P. Elliot, Staff Counsel, Anthony Mischel, Industrial Relations Counsel, for Defendants and Appellants.

Altshuler Berzon LLP, Stephen P. Berzon, Scott A. Kronland, Rebekah Evenson, San Francisco; Altshuler, Berzon, Nussbaum, Rubin & Demain, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Cox, Castle & Nicholson LLP, John S. Miller, Jr., Dwayne P. McKenzie, Los Angeles, for the California Building Industry on behalf of Plaintiff and Respondent.

Edmund G. Brown, Jr. Attorney General, Stacy Boulware Eurie, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Christopher E. Krueger, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Erin V. Peth, Deputy Attorney General for State Treasurer Bill Lockyear on behalf of Plaintiff and Respondent.

Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal LLP and John L. Williams, Walnut Creek; Cook Brown, LLP, Dennis B. Cook, Lisa V. Ryan, Sacramento, for Real Party in Interest.

Goldfarb & Lipman, Lee C. Rosenthal, Lynn Hutchins, Oakland, on behalf of Real Party in Interest.


RICHMAN, J.

Labor Code section 1720 embodies the long-standing public policy of California to require employers engaged on public works projects to pay the prevailing wage to their workers if the project is "paid for in whole or in part out of public funds."1 The novel question presented here is whether tax credits provided by the state to facilitate construction of low-income housing comes within this definition. The trial court concluded...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases