The court erred in denying that aspect of defendant's motion seeking to continue plaintiff's deposition. The transcript of the deposition shows that plaintiff's attorney repeatedly obstructed defendant's attorney's examination of plaintiff by unilaterally restricting defense counsel's line of questioning to matters "directly relate[d] to liability or damages," and requesting numerous, unnecessary breaks (see 22 NYCRR part 221; Orner v Mount Sinai Hosp.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
RAPOPORT v. CAMBRIDGE DEVELOPMENT, LLC
51 A.D.3d 530 (2008)
859 N.Y.S.2d 33
SOLOMON RAPOPORT, Respondent, v. CAMBRIDGE DEVELOPMENT, LLC, Doing Business as ATRIA RETIREMENT LIVING, Appellant. (And a Third-Party Action.)
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided May 20, 2008.
Decided May 20, 2008.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
