Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The petitioner alleged that he was injured when an unhinged, heavy, metal door fell on him while he was working in a clinic owned and operated by the respondents.
Contrary to the petitioner's contention, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying his petition for leave to serve a late notice of claim upon the respondents. In determining whether to grant leave to serve a late notice of claim...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.