1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 70 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 70 Cal.Rptr.3d 495 (2008)
 

SUMPTER v. MATTESON

No. B193915.

70 Cal.Rptr.3d 495 (2008)

158 Cal.App.4th 928

Tasha SUMPTER et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Richard Arden MATTESON et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Three.

January 10, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donahoo & Associates and Richard E. Donahoo, Santa Ana, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Kinkle, Rodiger & Spriggs, Guillermo W. Schnaider and R. Denyse Greer, Los Angeles, for Defendants and Respondents.

KLEIN, P.J.

Plaintiffs and appellants Tasha Sumpter (Sumpter) and Mykayle Booker (Mykale), by and through his guardian ad litem, Sumpter (collectively, Sumpter), appeal a judgment following a jury verdict in their favor and against defendants and respondents Richard Arden Matteson (Matteson) and Dorman DeHaas (DeHaas). Sumpter contends the jury's award of $13,317.91 in economic damages was insufficient as a matter of law and that punitive damages must be assessed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases