Contrary to the defendant's contentions, the recorded telephone conversations between the codefendant and an undercover police officer, in which the logistics for the subject criminal drug transaction were arranged, were properly admitted into evidence. These conversations did not constitute hearsay, but rather, represented part of the criminal res gestae (see People v Santos,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. ADAMES
53 A.D.3d 503 (2008)
862 N.Y.S.2d 80
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAMIE ADAMES, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided July 1, 2008.
Decided July 1, 2008.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.