Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with one bill of costs.
The plaintiff's motion, although denominated as a "motion to restore," was, in actuality, a motion for leave to reargue since it was virtually identical to his prior motion to restore, which had been denied in an order of the same court dated April 17, 2006 (see generally Johnson v Ford,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.