1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 376 S.C.
  5. 376 S.C. 165 (2008)
 

KURSCHNER v. CAMDEN PLANNING COM'N

No. 26414.

376 S.C. 165 (2008)

656 S.E.2d 346

Robert K. and Sharon G. KURSCHNER, Appellants, v. CITY OF CAMDEN PLANNING COMMISSION, Respondent.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Decided January 14, 2008.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William S. Tetterton, of Camden, and Holly Palmer Beeson, of Baker Ravenel & Bender, of Columbia, for Appellants.

Charles V.B. Cushman, III, of Camden, Weston Adams, III, Jillian M. Benson, and Walter Ralph Frye, III, all of McAngus Goudelock & Courie, LLC, of Columbia, for Respondent.

Robert J. Sheheen, of Savage, Royall & Sheheen, of Camden, for Amicus Curiae Adjoining Landowners and the Trustees of the Legacy of Mary Boykin Chestnut.

Chief Justice TOAL.

This is an appeal from Respondent City of Camden Planning Commission's ("the Commission") denial of Appellants Robert and Sharon Kurschner's ("the Kurschners") application to subdivide their property. We affirm.

FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In 1989, the Kurschners purchased a 5.49 acre tract of land in the City of Camden known as Sarsfield, the former residence of Mary Boykin Chestnut...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases